Operating at a community level, there are about 12,000 gacaca jurisdictions, of which 1,545 are designed to conduct most of the trials. Gacaca is highly lauded by the government and many outside observers as the solution to rwandas genocide. There is a possibility for compensation, where perpetrators could make a gift of a cow to their victims, for. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system. Yet the gacaca courts established to try perpetrators of the. The closing of the gacaca courts and the implications for. The principles and process of these courts hope to mitigate the failures of arusha justice at the tribunal and seeks to punish or reintegrate over one hundred thousands genocide suspects.
Following the 1994 genocide, several justice initiatives were implemented in rwanda, including a tribunal established by the united nations, rwandas national court system and gacaca, a traditional communityrun conflict resolution mechanism adapted to prosecute genocide perpetrators. B this article has been rated as bclass on the projects quality scale. Therefore the gacaca was used to settle disputes to bring back harmony in the society while addressing the root cause of the problem at the same time. Tilburg university the legacy of the gacaca courts in rwanda. May 16, 2017 the gacaca courts generated valuable information about the genocide suspects and increased access to the justice system. At the time of writing in mid2009, approximately 12,000 gacaca courts are in operation at the cell, sector and appeals levels. They have the power to try defendants charged with category 2 and 3 offences of genocide and other crimes against humanity. Initially, many rwandans placed their hopes in the wellfunded international criminal tribunal for. The gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation. Originally, these traditional communitybased courts helped to resolve disputes such land wrangles, thefts, marital issues, and vandalism. These confessions helped survivors to know the truth. However, a person can be linked to multiple cases hence the reason why there are more cases than individuals. The gacaca courts also provide the opportunity for grievances to be aired in public, which is vital in a country where victims are living side by side with perpetrators.
A researcher, who studied two gacaca pilot programs for five months, noted that the official discourse is so. Before 1994, rwanda was an almost unknown country hidden in the heart of africa. As you have access to this article, a pdf of this content is available in through. Gacaca, the local courts in rwanda, o cially closed on 18 june 2012. Almost fifteen years have passed since the genocide of 1994 in which up to one million mainly tutsi men, women and children were massacred and which left behind countless. Initially the idea sounded good and the gacaca courts had the following objectives which will be discussed one by one to find out whether they have achieved these expectations. Its restorative foundations require that suspects will be tried and. The system dealt mainly with civil and social conflicts between members of the community. Gacaca courts originate from the traditional system of conflict resolution called gacaca. Detailed qualitative research highlights how personnel inside gacaca view their central contribution as having been toward obtaining a local understanding of the conflict. Global tides volume 8 article 4 112014 an analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court system in postgenocide rwanda lauren haberstock pepperdine university, lauren.
Request pdf the gacaca courts, postgenocide justice and reconciliation in rwanda. An assessment of rwandas gacaca courts semantic scholar. May 04, 2014 the national service of the gacaca courts snjg, the overseeing government body, communicated following a closing ceremony in 2012 that 1,003,227 individuals stood trial during the 7 years that gacaca was operational. Between fantasy and reality jacques fierens abstract faced with an overflowing caseload and imperatives of national reconciliation, rwandan authorities have established a system of traditional justice, meted out through gacaca courts under the legal framework created by organic laws. Almost fifteen years have passed since the genocide of 1994 in which up to one million mainly tutsi men, women and children were. An innovative experiment in the postgenocide pursuit of. Twentyeight interviews with genocide survivors provide insight into how changing. Gacaca community courts girinka one cow per poor household programme imihigo performance contracts ingando solidarity camps jumelage twinning with other institutions ntibigenda neza off track tronc commun lower secondary school level ubudehe communitybased participatory approach umuduguduimidugudu villages umuganda community work. Since their inception in 2001, the gacaca courts have been praised for their efficiency and for.
The legacy of rwandas communitybased gacaca courts hrw. It was also realised that the testimonies of perpetrators needed to be recorded so that the world could learn about what happened in rwanda and how. Sep 01, 2005 category 1 offences were excluded from the jurisdiction of the gacaca courts and were to be judged by the ordinary courts according to the system set out in the 1996 law. Sentences passed by gacaca tribunals cannot be appealed before the supreme court. In the gacaca court of the cell, the day and time for meetings are fixed by the general assembly. The gacaca courts were resurrected in rwanda as an indigenous form of restorative justice. Faced with this stark reality, the rwandan government began to look for other ways of bringing to justice the perpetrators of the genocide.
We find that the gacaca courts performed well relative to the formal justice system, given the constraints faced. Schabas abstract after many decades of impunity, rwanda has embarked upon a course of transitional justice committed to prosecuting all who are suspected of involvement in the 1994 genocide. The effectiveness of the gacaca courts in postgenocide rwanda. Gacaca courts, as a traditional dispute resolution mechanism, predate the rwandan state and have been in place in rwanda since the 15th century. However, the functional qualities of repair also relates to notions of truthtelling and the practical and therapeutic qualities which are associated with it brouneus 2008. The contribution of the gacaca jurisdictions to resolving. Investing in authoritarian rule punishment and patronage. The gacaca courts represent a third jurisdictionthe others are the rwandan state criminal courts, the competent courts of other states that apply the principle of universal jurisdiction, and the unmandated international criminal.
It is our belief that the gacaca courts will intensify a retributive sense of justice and a desire for vengeance among the hutu majority in rwanda, thereby contributing to, rather than curtailing, the risk of ethnic violence in the long run. This is because many confessed their crimes, and their testimonies in most cases proved to be genuine. An analysis of the effectiveness of the gacaca court. What is the nature of interaction between each of the three levels of gacaca courts. Rwandas gacaca courts are hailed as a postgenocide. Category 2 consisted of homicide or attempted homicide and category 3 of serious attacks without the intent to cause the death of the victims. After the gacaca courts finished their work in june 2012, the reintegration of perpetrators required that they be given a space to interact with other members of the society and express themselves. From the outset, most international observers fiercely opposed the use of gacaca for trying genocide crimes. Rwandas troubled gacaca courts africa criminal justice reform.
In 2001, rwanda incorporated a traditional, communitybased. Some video extracts for students of ma reconciliation at the university of winchester. Chapter 4 discusses the mandate of the gacaca courts and the current appraisals of their practice, arguing for the importance of taking specific account of the agency of the locally elected lay judges, the inyangamugayo. Rwandas gacaca courts are hailed as a postgenocide success. Journal of contemporary criminal justice genocide, justice. By extension, it is the name given to new peoples courts charged since 2005 with ruling on cases arising from the genocide.
If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Mid this article has been rated as midimportance on the projects. The seat for the gacaca court can meet legitimately if at least seven 7 of its members are present. In an attempt to guarantee accountability for the genocide, to promote rule of law, and to speed up the prosecution of those accused of genocide crimes, the government developed a novel court. In this contribution, the legacy of the gacaca courts is studied by looking at what the gacaca courts have achieved or may not have achieved against the objectives it was set up for in the rst place from the per spective of genocide survivors. The year 2005 was a turning point in the progress of the gacaca courts and in the reintegration of perpetrators into their communities. The first phase, which began in 1997 and is still continuing, targets the most serious offenders. Rwanda gacaca genocide courts finish work bbc news. In this contribution, the legacy of the gacaca courts is studied by looking at what the gacaca courts have achieved or may not have achieved against the objectives it was set up for in the first place from the perspective of genocide survivors. They revealed where victims had been thrown into mass.
Rwanda ictr but it has been plagued by inefficiencies and. In february 1999, when the rwandan government was still debating the possibility of adapting gacaca to meet its needs, the united nations office of the high commissioner for human rights ohchr argued vehemently that communitybased courts were illequipped to handle complex genocide. Gacaca, the local courts in rwanda, officially closed on 18 june 2012. Eleven years after the rwandan genocide in which up to a million tutsis and moderate. In other gacaca courts, the day and time are determined by the seat members of the court and communicated to the population. Collectively, the gacaca courts are coordinated by the national service of gacaca jurisdiction a nsgja, an agency under the auspices of the ministry of justice. Pris research on gacaca penal reform international. Jun 18, 2012 rwandas controversial community gacaca courts finish their work, after 10 years of trying those accused of involvement in the 1994 genocide. In february 1999, when the rwandan government was still debating the possibility of adapting gacaca to meet its needs, the united nations office of the high commissioner for human rights ohchr argued vehemently that communitybased courts were illequipped to handle complex. The contribution of the gacaca jurisdictions to resolving cases. Producing expertise in a transitional justice setting. Feb 14, 2007 gacaca courts dont try the planners and instigators of genocide. This hearing took place in the bugesera region of kigali ngali province in 2003 and represents a common scene from thousands of towns and villages across rwanda that since 2002 have been participating in a revolutionary court system known as gacaca.
A modified version of the traditional gacaca courts was introduced to hear cases from the backlog of over 100,000 genocide suspects. It has become apparent that there is a need for a followon for the gacaca trials. By extension, now the name for the new, popular courts that have been hearing genocide litigation since 2005. Eight years on a record of gacaca monitoring in rwanda 8 chronology of relevant events sources. Since the law on the creation of gacaca jurisdictions is based on the law of 1996 on the organization of the prosecution for offences constituting the crime of genocide or crimes against humanity committed since 1 october 1990, it provides for the same commonlaw.
Uploaded by yasuo uchida, digital ebook pdf investing in authoritarian rule punishment and patronage in rwandas gacaca courts for genocide crimes cambridge studies in law and society contains important information and a detailed explanation all about ebook pdf. The legacy of rwandas communitybased gacaca courts. The report highlights the many remaining issues concerning the quality of the justice. The principles and process of these courts hope to mitigate the failures of arusha justice at the tribunal and seeks to punish or reintegrate over one hundred thousand genocide suspects. Barriers to justice for rape victims in rwanda hrw.
The gacaca law divides crimes into three categories. Rwandas gacaca courts international journal for court. Among its many initiatives, none has gained as much attention as the innovative judicial initiative known as gacaca. During the rwandan genocide the hutu majority slaughtered 800,000 tutsi and moderate hutus, leaving the country with. In a rwandan village near the burundi border, a crowd chatters impatiently beneath a tattered blue tarpaulin shielding them from the midday sun. After taking power in 1994, the rwandan patriotic front put a government in place.
Between 250,000 and 500,000 women were raped during the rwandan genocide in 1994. Hutus were killed, the rwandan government has launched a national. Pdf this article presents unique material from indepth interviews with 16 women in rwanda who have testified in the gacaca, the village. We begin this article by discussing the historical context leading up to.
Jun 15, 2012 these courts were based on the traditional system of settling disputes in which judges are inyangamugayo or people of great integrity. Genocide trials and gacaca courts journal of international. This article is within the scope of wikiproject africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of africa on wikipedia. The introduction of the gacaca courts improved the performance of the formal justice system and facilitated post. Sep 01, 2005 19 a gacaca court is established in each cell, each sector, each district or city and in each province of the rwandan republic art. Pdf the publications on the modernized gacaca courts dealing with the legacy of the rwandan genocide are abundant and they often seem. Gacaca jurisdictions and their preparations january 2002 research on the gacaca july 2002 the guilty plea procedure, cornerstone of the rwandan justice system january 2003 research on the gacaca september 2003 research report on the gacaca kibuye case study, part 1 november 2003 research report on gacaca courts.
226 1129 1284 1097 1604 797 1526 950 179 1250 1325 389 1564 33 736 1383 703 181 1616 1074 1092 1238 1229 180 15 558 1703 488 96 1445 1190 633 1347 1747 758 355